Update RE-106 6 3/4" Salad Fork with 18/8 Stainless Grade, Regency Pattern
IN STOCK: Ships in 1 Business Day
20+ in Stock
Retail Price: $33.18
$16.08 /1 Dozen
Update RE-106 Description
The Update RE-106 salad fork brings an elevated look to restaurant environments with its mirror polish, regency pattern, and extra-heavy weight. This item is 18/8 stainless steel, so it is made of 18 percent chrome and 8 percent nickel for durability. Operators will not be able to use a magnetic flatware retriever to pull it from the trash since its material contains no magnets.
Product Details
- Made of strong 18/8 stainless steel
- Features a regency pattern and mirror polish
- Extra heavy, fitting firmly in user's hand
*Update RE-106 is free shipping eligible. Users must be signed in with an order total greater than $500 and be shipping to the 48 contiguous states.
From The Manufacturer
Update Internationalâ„¢ - Salad Fork, 6.75"L, extra heavy weight, 2.5 mm thickness, 18/8 stainless steel, mirror polish, Regency
*Image may not depict product color, inclusions or accessories.
Update RE-106 Specifications
Spec Attribute | Spec Value |
---|---|
Manufacturer | Update |
Finish | Mirror |
Overall Length (in) | 6.75 |
Pattern | Regency |
Product | Salad Fork |
Product Type | Flatware |
Stainless Steel Grade | 18/8 |
Weight | 1.10 |
Other Products From This Line
Compare to Similar Items
Attributes | ![]() Current Item: Update RE-106 6 3/4" Salad Fork with 18/8 Stainless Grade, Regency Pattern |
![]() Winco 0030-06 6 3/4" Salad Fork with 18/8 Stainless Grade, Shangarila Pattern |
---|---|---|
Customer Rating |
|
|
Price | $16.08 | $9.51 |
Shipping | Shipping Cost Calculated in Cart | Shipping Cost Calculated in Cart |
Lead Time | IN STOCK: Ships in 1 Business Day | IN STOCK: Ships in 1 Business Day |
Pattern | Regency | Shangarila |
Collection | ||
Stainless Steel Grade | 18/8 | 18/8 |
Finish | Mirror | Mirror |
-
"These are well worth the money. You do not have to worry about them bending and the shine is great. I just wish the shipping was cheaper."